About the people behind GenAI Content
We provide link data for editors who review generative drafts. This page says what that means and where it ends.
What we are
GenAI Content is a developer API and a free online explorer for backlinks, referring domains, anchor text, top pages and a 0 to 100 Domain Rating, and every response comes back as JSON. That is the whole product.
We wrote these guides for teams that use generative tools for first drafts and want a domain quality checker in the review step. The GenAI Content editorial team writes them, and we do not publish under invented personal names. Short and plain.
Reviewers, freelancers and developers who build content pipelines all use the same account type, and there is no separate plan for any of them, whatever the size of the team or the volume of drafts. One account. To reach us, use the account page after signing in.
One rule applies. Say what the data can show, say what it cannot, and let the editor decide, because we would rather lose a click than overstate a score for the sake of a headline.
- domains indexed
- 181,132,097
- domain-to-domain links
- 2,774,625,913
- backlinks indexed
- ~798.5B
- approximate refresh cycle
- Monthly
What the product covers
Domain Rating
A 0 to 100 score from referring domains, free for single lookups.
Bulk scoring
Up to 2,000 domains in one call for 1 credit, which is $0.0001.
Referring domains and anchors
Two credits a call, up to 1,000 rows each, to dig into one source.
Billing
Prepaid credit topped up in USDT (TRC-20), with a $100 starter credit and no card.
Where the data comes from and how current it is
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Source | Our own crawler and our own link index |
| Refresh | About once a month; last week's links may not show yet |
| Score | DR = round(100 log(ref_domains+1) / log(210^7)), our own metric |
| Comparable to | Ahrefs DR or Moz DA in spirit, not the same number |
| Not included | Keyword research, rank tracking, daily crawl |
Who this is for
Editors first. Developers second. If you run a team that uses generative tools for first drafts, you probably have a review step already, and we hope to make one part of it cheaper. That part is checking the sites behind your citations and outbound links.
The free explorer on the home page needs no sign-up for single lookups. Developers who build the pipeline can read the rate and cost table, which lists every action with its credit price and its row limit, so nothing on the balance comes as a surprise. Simple.
What we deliberately do not claim
No promise of rankings. None. A good score from us does not make a source accurate, and a low score does not make it wrong, so we always encourage reading the page itself before any decision is made.
For a place to begin, try the review checklist or the Google guidance notes. Both are short. Each ends with a step you can take the same afternoon without asking anyone for budget or approval from above.
How we write these guides
We take positions. Where the answer is it depends, we say on what. Every guide is checked against our product facts, and every date we mention, such as the Google guidance of February 2023 or the March 2024 spam policies, is a public one.
If we show a worked example, it is labelled as an example. Always. We do not publish customer stories, testimonials or invented statistics, and we say so plainly rather than hide the gap.